The Geek in Question

Want to contact The Geek?
Drop me a line at tgiq.ce at gmail dot com!
Geeky Tweets
- RT @_ColinS_: "If you want to really appreciate Arctic biodiversity, you need to shift your gaze. Everything is really, really small." #csw… 1 week ago
- RT @_ColinS_: There are 2,000 species are arthropods living above the Arctic circle. #cswa2013 1 week ago
- RT @_ColinS_: "Any changes to the Arctic ecosystem will be reflected by the arthropods." #cswa2013 1 week ago
Follow me on NetworkedBlogs!
| Blog: |
| The Bug Geek |
Topics: |
| Insects, Nature, Photography |
Flickr Photos
|
BugShot 2012 Crowd-Funding
Goal: $1000 (registration and half of the travel expenses)
Raised: $800
YOU PEOPLE ARE SO AWESOME! Thank you!!!
Copyright
All photographs are my own, unless otherwise noted. All text and images appearing on www.thebuggeek.com © C. M. Ernst 2009-2012 and may not be used without prior permission. See "About the Photographs" to learn more.







Nice! I’m going to disagree with your identification, though, which is very close but not quite there.
Citronella ants are a small clade(Acanthomyops) nested within the larger genus Lasius, identifiable by a reduced palp count and (usually) a completely shiny integument with few appressed hairs.
Your ants are certainly Lasius, but they look too velvety to be Citronella ants. There are several of these small yellowish species- I might pick L. nearcticus or L. flavus for yours. If you were to open a nest of true Citronella ants you’d notice an obvious, heavy citronella odor as if someone just opened a perfume bottle.
Thank goodness a voice of reason chimed in before I made a fool of myself! (Oops, too late! Told you I suck at ants!)
To be honest, I was on the fence about it. I made a point of taking a really good sniff when I found this bunch and couldn’t detect anything lemony.
So this aphid-farming business, it’s prevalent in the genus?
There are a lot of Lasius species, and they’re not always that easy to tell apart. Interestingly, the last thorough revision (excluding the Citronella ant clade) was done by E. O. Wilson himself, as his Ph.D. dissertation in the 1950′s.
As to the subterranean aphids, the association is rampant throughout the genus. I would argue it is one of the defining characteristics. Definitely worth watching.
“the last thorough revision (excluding the Citronella ant clade) was done by E. O. Wilson himself, as his Ph.D. dissertation in the 1950’s. ”
Cool!
The aphid thing is pretty darn cool. Had I not been reading about the Citronellas yesterday (where I saw the bit about the root aphids mentioned), I probably would have overlooked or misinterpreted what was going on.
Pingback: Circus of the Spineless #50 « Arthropoda
Great sequence! These interactions are interesting, and once more you have given me something to look out for.
I’m glad I’ve come up with another worthy treasure hunt, Adrian. I hope you’ll share your findings if you come up with something!