The Geek in Question

Want to contact The Geek?
Drop me a line at tgiq.ce at gmail dot com!
Geeky Tweets
- @LorraineBrett20 Liar. 4 months ago
- @LorraineBrett20 You didn't just "hear" a different idea, you *endorsed* one. 4 months ago
- @tpoi I need a folder like that. 7 months ago
Blog: |
The Bug Geek |
Topics: |
Insects, Nature, Photography |
Flickr Photos
BugShot 2012 Crowd-Funding
Goal: $1000 (registration and half of the travel expenses)
Raised: $800
YOU PEOPLE ARE SO AWESOME! Thank you!!!
Copyright
All photographs and text are my own, unless otherwise noted. All text and images appearing on www.thebuggeek.com © C. M. Ernst 2009-2013 and may not be used without prior permission. See "About the Photographs" to learn more.
Cheer up li’l BugGeek, we haves faith in you.
*sniff* thanks
Too funny!
NOT FUNNY.
I’m already looking forward to next Monday’s graph! At the rate you’re moving on that manuscript it’ll be the post-acceptance celebratory beer drinking graph!
I hope I’ll be finished with this thing before Monday!!!! (People will get sick of me if I keep whinging about the same manuscript for weeks on end :P)
This is great! I am experiencing the discussion “I will never be a scientist” phase. It is nice to know that other scientists (or biology grad students) feel this despair as well 😉 Thanks for making me smile. Good luck with R!
My own supervisor left a comment on my original post about this process (and that awful discussion pit), and said that pretty much everybody (even professors!) go through this stuff. I’m glad this made you smile at least!
Love the humor you throw into your posts!! I always find myself enjoying your posts the whole way through. Agreed, editors will not hesitate to go out of their way to criticize. If your blog posts are anything like your project,,,, they won’t take you seriously.
BUT, if you put as much care into your project as you do your blog (from what I can see) I bet it’ll turn out quite nicely 🙂
As much as I’m moaning about the revisions, the honest truth is that I got some really excellent and insightful feedback from my advisor and colleagues and I know that the final product is going to be much stronger and more cohesive in the end (and therefore more likely to get accepted!). The revisions are painful, but definitely worth it!
Oi, I hate that feeling, too. If it helps, we all get that; that feeling of despair is why I started Rejection Watch. Even if it has petered out, the response I got was more than indicative of the generality of that pit you’re in.
And hey, if R is giving you trouble, don’t forget that more than a few of your followers on Twitter are reasonably competent with the devil stats package; I’d even include myself in that club, and if I can dare to speak for the lot of us, we’d be happy to help. 🙂
Good luck with the revisions! (Seriously, though, is the figure at the end of the graph holding a torch? Because that strikes me as being .. unsafe?)
Thanks Steve, I forgot about using Twitter as an R sounding board. Right now I feel like I have to wallow it for a little while, if only to make sure that I really THINK about it (and therefore, ideally, understand it better in the long run)…but after I get past that point I may come crying to my tweeps 🙂
As for the cartoon in the graph, it comes from here:
http://hyperboleandahalf.blogspot.ca/2010/06/this-is-why-ill-never-be-adult.html
(If you don’t know this comic blog, you should. It’s not very active right now but the archives are well worth a read.)
Ha! I forgot that that particular post actually begins with a graph too! LOL!
oh how i absolutely love this – plus addition of hyperbole and half wonderfulness! you can do it, you can do it! i’m currently in the “waiting for collaborator revision”, which is basically speaking into the microphone of an empty room….is this thing still on? 😉
also…..R. I can sum that up in one word…ugggggggggggggh.
LOL! My partner comes home and says “what were you doing all day?”, and I say, “Aaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr”. Also, why do I not have your blog linked to mine yet? Fixed! 😀
Pingback: Rejection Watch Vol. 1, Supplementary Online Material « A Bit of Behavioral Ecology
I feel for you. It’s frustrating as hell! I was unable to publish 2 papers, because the stats were just too difficult for me. Back then, we had different stats programs. I even contacted the president of the local statistical club (yes, I was amazed to find out there are such organizations) to ask if I could actually pay someone good money to help me get the stats done. No one in the club was interested. Big bummer.
Ha! I remember when I was an MSc. student, I was all “I’ll just pay someone to do my stats for me”. So much for that idea! 😀
testing new comment format…